Rand Paul’s Lawsuit Against Obama Uses Plagiarized Content

rand paulJust copy from someone else. Isn’t that what you do if you can’t think of the right words to say?

The Tea Party member and Republican senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul, recently filed a lawsuit against President Obama and heads of government agencies connected with the National Security Agency’s bulk data collection program. The suit seeks to have the practice declared unconstitutional. But what was contained in the suit is becoming a plagiarization scandal.

Paul’s lawyer, Ken Cuccinelli, collaborated with Bruce Fein, a former Reagan administration lawyer in writing the suit. Both Fein and his spokeswoman, his ex-wife, are now claiming that Fein had not been fully paid for his work and that the suit stole credit for it.

One example: Cuccinelli’s version says: “Since the MATP was publicly disclosed, public opinion polls showed widespread opposition to the dragnet collection, storage, retention, and search of telephone metadata collected on every domestic or international phone call made or received by citizens or permanent resident aliens in the United States.”

Fein’s version reads: “When the MATP was disclosed by Edward Snowden, public opinion polls showed widespread opposition to the dragnet collection, storage, retention, and search of telephone metadata collected on every domestic or international phone call made or received by citizens or permanent resident aliens in the United States.”

How this scandal will play out over time is unknown. As for the lawsuit, the Obama administration is standing by the program’s legality, despite its own efforts to curtail NSA surveillance in recent months.

With the proliferation of blogs and extensive use of Wikipedia as official sources, academic plagiarism is definitely on the rise. Paul’s decision to use the easiest and quickest way is nothing new…but is it right?

Let me know what you think.

In This Huge Sustainability World…You Matter

Almost every day I am reminded of being a good environmental steward.  Public service announcements have President Obama encouraging home energy efficiency from the oval office.  News articles tout the value of water conservation.  In my local community, I can place my recyclable glass, plastic, and aluminum cans for weekly curbside pickup.  Since this is voluntary in my community, it feels good to know that I am doing my part in preserving life on earth.

However, various studies have shown that most utilities have a long way to go on educating consumers about smart energy and water management.  Furthermore, I notice that very few of the neighbors in my suburban development recycle.  Surely, many of my educated and professional neighbors should understand the value sustaining our planet.

The fact is that this entire “green” movement is still abstract to the average person, and it does not resonate to most of us in a way that is immediately personal.  As I engage people on topics of the environment, it has occurred to me that I spend most of the time simplifying the message for people.  At that point, I get the “now I get it” response.

It’s not that hard, but it takes some effort. When President Obama ran for office his second term, there were countless commercials touting the effects of voting. “Yes, in the grand scheme of things your vote does count…” is what we heard. And it does. Every little bit counts. The same goes for recycling. Every bottle you recycle, every plastic bag that gets reused, every light that is not turned on…matters. The people need to know, and need to know the way they understand.

Messaging and strategic communication are critical.  Government entities, utilities, and major community stakeholders have to simplify the message.  We are told to get ready for the Smart Grid or to reduce our carbon footprint.  If we are to really prompt public behavior modification, then we have to put an end to the esoteric jargon.   This necessitates effective public relations and strategic communication planning.  When you can explain to a 93-year-old grandmother exactly how reducing her carbon footprint can require less of her fixed income, now we are onto something. In This Huge Sustainability World…You Matter